Monday, May 30, 2016

Short-Lived


Ratings can be cruel, and this year low ratings brought down a few new shows that I really enjoyed—or at least I thought they had a lot of potential.  The list includes Limitless, The Player, and The Family.  Agent Carter was cut as well, which makes me sad.  On the up side, The Catch got a somewhat surprising renewal.

In any case, before launching into the summer season, I thought I’d do a little catching up by at least getting the “dead” Fall shows out of the way.

This post covers a lot of shows, but I don't have a lot of thematic insight to connect them, aside from one observation:  More than a few of this Spring’s short-lived new shows were—perhaps not coincidentally—about mortality, and what people do when they become hyper-aware that death is real.  The “borrowed time” idea gave these shows room to play with their character’s most impulsive natures, distilling them down to the cores of themselves. 

But I suppose they didn’t feel sustainable.  Or perhaps, viewers didn’t want to face their own mortality.  Whatever it was, these shows are gone without much fanfare.

You, Me, and the Apocalypse (NBC, new.  Dramedy.)

Watched: first three episodes

Premise:  The lives of a few people slated to survive a presumed apocalypse in the period immediately preceding that apocalypse, told in flashbacks.

Promise:  The show focuses on who is in this small group and the disparate stories of how they ended up being chosen to survive an extinction-level event.  It’s self-consciously quirky, and an affectionate look at very flawed humans when they are given the opportunity to let go of day to day concerns.  Some create chaos, others turn to faith, others to vengeance, others to survival.  That seems realistic, in an odd way.  But although the show was amusing, I never found it so engaging that I craved it; it was just light amusement based largely on caricatured characters.  And although the global stakes were high—apocalypse!—that made the stakes for these particular characters feel low.

Verdict:  Had some really nice bits, but ultimately more of a curiosity than anything else.

Second Chance (Fox, new.  Science fiction/law enforcement drama)

Watched:  whole season, on and off.

Premise:  A retired sheriff brought back to life in a superpowered body helps fight crime while connecting with those who brought him back for their own selfish reasons.

Promise:  it’s a very high concept—I gather the inspiration was mostly Frankenstein, but the execution actually felt more like a superhero show.  Like most superheroes, the sheriff’s super strength creates super weaknesses; and the show had a much better reason for secret-identity-keeping than most shows.  There were a lot of things I liked about this show:  the relationship between the sheriff and his son and granddaughter; the complicated relationship between the brother and sister who brought the sheriff back; the emotional bond that the sheriff develops with the woman who saved him; the fact that the leads included a highly competent woman of color, the fact that everyone made a mix of good and bad decisions.  And I was really drawn in by the eventual themes:  what lengths we will go to to protect our loved ones, and the troublingly proprietary nature of love.  But there were also some problems with tone, as it oscillated between humor, science fiction, drama, and gritty cop show.

Ultimately, I was frustrated by its lost opportunities and dependence on stereotypes.  It fell into the “genius=no social skills” trap.  It fell into the “Asians believe in superstition” trap.  Just to name a couple.  And most of all, it fell into the “rules are impediments” trap.  The story takes place in a near-future where social media facilitates complete surveillance, and instead of highlighting how troubling that is, the show embraces its law enforcement potential.  Our sheriff uses his super strength to beat up bad guys and his ties to tech to frame perps and get around the need for warrants.  And it didn’t need to!

Verdict: It could have been a really powerful show about the complicated nature of love and family.  It could even have been a law enforcement drama.  Instead it felt all too normal.

Recovery Road (Freeform, new.  Teen Drama.)

Watched: pilot

Premise: a troubled teen finds a home among her fellow misfits in rehab.

Promise: There are a few things to like about this show—its racial diversity, its affection for misfits, its strong themes about the importance support in the face of temptation and self-delusion.  But there are also some weird things.  Like many Freeform shows, this one puts young people in adult situations and portrays very immature adults, which is a weird pattern.  The tone oscillates between preachy and soapy, when I wish it would just tell stories.  And its inciting incident really turned me off.  This teen finally snaps toward wanting to recover from her alcoholism when she discovers she might have been raped while she was blackout drunk.  While that’s realistic in its way, it also reinforces the rape culture idea that “rape is actually good for women” because it builds character. I don’t think that was the intent, but it turned me off.  It wouldn’t have been fatal if I’d felt more connected to the characters, but in the pilot there wasn’t much to latch on to in the big ensemble cast.

Verdict: Might have enjoyed it if I had more time, but after the pilot the preachy tone got to me and I didn’t care enough about the people to believe the stakes mattered.

Containment (CW, new.  Thriller.)

Watched: pilot

Premise:  An outbreak in Atlanta leads to forced quarantine of part of the city.

Promise: For any conventional disaster movie concept—here, the devolution of quarantine into chaos—the story success of the story depends heavily on the personalities of the characters. If we care about them, we care about how they weather the disaster.  If we don’t, meh.  Here, most of the characters are easy archetypes, but the writing is self-aware enough use our expectations for storytelling purposes.  The cast is racially mixed—anything else for a story about Atlanta would be troubling, but I highlight it here because I think the cast is uncommonly diverse, which is worth praising—but the show’s rosy picture of interracial harmony leaves me feeling like there may have been more opportunity to depict how a public health crisis and quarantine could bring up real important, difficult issues of race.  And it didn’t seem like the show was planning to do that.  It did set up some interesting large-scale and small-scale dramas nonetheless.  

Verdict:  I ended up not watching much of the show, but more for time than anything else.  It looked like it could have transcended the ordinariness of its form.

Rush Hour (CBS, new.  Banter procedural.)

Watched:  Several episodes

Premise:  A straight-laced, martial arts-expert Chinese police officer partners with a fast-talking LAPD officer to fight crime.

Promise:  the show is based on the film series of the same name, and has much the same tone, although of course different actors.  The show is fine and the performances are strong, but in all it feels largely uninspired, as it relies largely on stereotypes and tropes for its material.  It’s a pretty standard “rules are impediments” procedural (bleh) with a no-nonsense female police boss (to which I don’t object, but this is an increasingly popular trope that really deserves its own post), damsels in distress (sigh) and a lovable criminal sidekick (double sigh).  There are some really lovely moments, many of them belonging to actor Jon Foo as he performs great martial arts stunts and particularly when we see the subtle undercurrents of loyalty and friendship that underlie his character’s decisions, but the rest is pretty ordinary.

Verdict:  fine background viewing, but not appointment television.

Beowulf (Esquire, new to US (originally produced by ITV).  Fantasy.)

Watched:  Season

Premise: A fantasy hero fights monsters and navigates political power-struggles.

Promise:  I have no idea what this show has to do with Beowulf, aside from some of the names of the characters.  But it was an acceptable fantasy epic, with magical beasts and swords and big themes like pride and succession.  It has a bit of the lighthearted winking tone of other UK fantasy shows like Robin Hood and Merlin, but resides tonally somewhere between those shows and the Last Kingdom.  But unlike Last Kingdom, it makes no pretense of historical accuracy, so can be as fanciful as it likes. And weirdly enough, despite deeply silly monsters and scene-chewing performances, it actually has some really cool themes.  It addresses the unfairnesses of inequality and the challenge of family.  It’s more emotionally and thematically complex than it has any business being: its heroes are not all good and its villains are not all bad.  It’s fascinatingly multiracial and it gives its women agency.  There were actually a few times I actually found myself cheering at its portrayal of lots of different kinds of women.  

Verdict:  There were a lot of silly things about this show.  But surprisingly high number of good things, too.  I’m kind of sad there won’t be more of it.

Game of Silence (NBC, new.  Drama.)

Watched:  pilot

Premise:  A group of adult friends who had been sentenced to juvenile prison after a prank seek vengeance on those who mistreated them when they were young.

Promise:  It took a while to figure out what the show was about, and once I did, I was very intrigued by the premise.  The show is based on a Turkish series, which pleased me.  I loved that the characters had grown apart and then came together from different walks of life to accomplish their goal of justice, and the idea of these disparate people banding together to right the wrongs done to them sounded fascinating to me.  It could have explored the legacy of trauma and the complicated meaning of justice.  But this show didn’t do what I was hoping it would—it very quickly turned into a revenge fantasy, in which the characters turned to secrecy, violence, crime, and lying to the women in their lives (ostensibly to “protect” them)  rather than seeking justice through openness or law.  The show was shockingly and explosively violent, and never gave me any reason to think that any of them would make good decisions.

Verdict:  disappointing.

Of Kings and Prophets (ABC, new.  Historical drama.)  Two SimonBakers.

Premise: Adapts the biblical Books of Samuel for television.

Prejudice: As far as I can tell, this show was designed to treat the Bible as if it were Game of Thrones. Which isn’t the worst idea in the world, but is definitely not the best either, and I suspected that it was going to be unnecessarily violent and full of women who were either sexy temptresses or power-hungry manipulators, and nothing else.  The “queen or concubine” model of femininity didn’t appeal to me for obvious reasons.  But I would have at least watched the pilot it if I’d had time.  I didn’t.


Finally, some SimonBakers for a show that was renewed for a second season, but I’m not going to watch it regardless, so why wait any longer:

Vinyl (HBO, new.  Period drama.) Four SimonBakers.

Premise: Exploits of a record producer in the 1970s.

Prejudice:  Something about the premise of this show and the way it was promoted makes me disgusted and almost angry.  As far as I can tell it uncritically glorifies and romanticizes a culture of machismo and female objectification, where every woman is a model or an actress or a receptionist or a groupie, and that’s just who women are.  But men are important artists who struggle.  Whether that’s what the show is actually about?  I don’t know.  But I’ve seen nothing that indicates to the contrary.

On the DVR/Unreviewed:  I actually feel like I can finally list them, at long last. Colony, Billions, DC’s Legends of Tomorrow, Outsiders, Hap & Leonard, Underground, Criminal Minds: Beyond Borders,
The Girlfriend Experience, The Last Panthers, Houdini & Doyle, Preacher.

Saturday, May 7, 2016

Knowability


A few recent shows have invited us to examine how well we know those closest to us, and whether our bonds are as real as we want them to be.  The shows are very different from each other, in tone and subject matter, but they all raise some of the same questions about the relationship between credulity and hope. 

Classic con shows like Hustle and Leverage are based on the premise that you can’t con an honest man, and it’s conventional TV wisdom that viewers find it hard to root for a character who gets fooled early.  And yet, these shows start from a completely different premise:  that our instinct is to love and trust one another, and that that instinct can lead even the wary into deceptive waters. 

There’s a risk in such stories, of sending the message that people should know better than to trust—that caring is futile or dangerous.  That we should keep our guards up or close ourselves off. But these shows don’t send that message, and that’s impressive.  They make us wonder about the reliability of trust without thinking less of it, the way we never thought less of Mulder for wanting to believe.  Instead, we think that people should be able to trust each other, and bemoan those times that call for doubt.  So there’s an inherent optimism in these shows: even as they make us question, they make us hope we already know the answer, that people are basically good.

Fascinatingly, all but one of these shows is on ABC.  Not sure what to make of that.  Even less sure what to make of the fact that although I like all of them, the ones I like most are probably not returning for a second season.  Humph.

Quantico (ABC, new Fall 2015.  Law enforcement drama.)

Watched:  Most episodes

Premise:  An FBI agent is framed for terrorism by someone she trained with at Quantico.

Promise:  The show proceeds on two timelines, one tracking the current investigation and the other flashing back to the characters’ Quantico training.  I had trouble enjoying How To Get Away With Murder partly because of its appalling version of legal education, but I don’t have the same passion for law enforcement training, so I’m not bothered by what I assume are equivalent problems in this show.  The result is a pretty conventional exploration of “who’s the bad guy when everyone has secrets”—reminiscent, even, of Agatha Christie—but with the added twist that these characters have trusted each other with their lives, which makes the betrayal all the more difficult for them to accept and investigate.  I struggled early with the characters’ catty competitiveness, which too often makes them unlikeable, but I kept watching because I kept thinking that it would eventually become the show I wanted to watch, the one in which the group works together to clear our heroine’s name.  That hasn’t quite happened, but the result has been juicy, twisty, and preposterous in a generally enjoyable but not indispensable way.  Still, my interest is waning. I especially tire of the flashbacks and wish we’d get on with the investigation; though they’re intertwined, the flashbacks undermine the show’s sense of urgency.  

Verdict:  Not quite what I’d hoped, but I’ve still enjoyed it.

London Spy (BBC America, winter 2016.  Spy drama.)

Watched:  Enjoying my way through the 5 episode season

Premise: A club kid develops a romantic relationship with an MI-6 analyst, and then investigates the analyst’s death.

Promise:  After the first episode’s setup, most of the series is the story of the surviving partner investigating what he believes was a conspiracy to kill his lover.  He is aided by a much older friend who has worked for MI-6 in the past.  Along the way, he confronts difficult questions about whether he ever really knew his lover.  The result is a beautiful, contemplative portrayal of the relationship’s development, a sensitive portrayal of the friendship that fuels the ensuing investigation, and a mystery thriller.  The combination is tense, personal, and ambiguous, and makes my heart ache for each of the characters even as they work to unravel the truth against impossible odds.  The story is both inextricably gay and entirely universal.  The pace slows and speeds effectively, giving the viewer the chance to feel emotion in what is otherwise a taut spy thriller.  I believe it’s a fully-contained series of 5 episodes, without a plan for a second season. That makes story sense, but I could still wish for more.  

Verdict:  Seek this one out.

The Family (ABC, new.  Crime Drama.)

Watched: Season so far

Premise: reappearance of a son presumed dead 10 years ago dredges up conflicts and raises new questions.

Promise: I’m really digging this one, which makes me sad to discover that the TV Grim Reaper doesn’t have high hopes for it.  It has much the same appeal as Broadchurch, with the same “feel for everyone, but trust no one” ethos.  Like Broadchurch and The Killing, it’s partly a mystery—at least at the start—but even more it’s an examination of the way the mystery changes the people involved in it.  The people’s reactions and decisions are complex and human, and no one comes out looking completely good or completely bad.  The story doles out enough information to keep us learning and surprised, but stays suspenseful.  

Verdict:  I like it, but it looks like it’ll be canceled after this season.  That’s a shame.

The Catch (ABC, new.  Con procedural.)

Watched: Season so far

Premise:  The complicated relationship between a high-end private investigator and a sophisticated con man.

Promise:  This show is an accomplishment.  It’s fast-moving, twisty, slick and styish.  It manages, impressively, to fit both a con procedural and a PI procedural into each episode, without losing sight of the characters’ arcs and relationships.  The cons are slightly better fleshed out than the PI investigations, but they all hold together surpirisingly well considering how compressed they have to be.  The relationships are sympathetic and compelling even when they’re ill-conceived.  And this somehow manages to fill the private-investigator gap left by Lie To Me and the con gap left by Hustle and Leverage.  The good good guys are good and the bad bad guys are bad, but most of the characters are somewhere in the middle, without being unsympathetic.  My chief critique is that I wish the main character (played by Mireille Enos) weren’t so performative—every line reading seems like it’s for the camera.  But I love that everyone is deeply clever—the characters’ wits and emotions are evenly matched—and I love the fast pace of plot.

Verdict:  TV Grim Reaper isn’t optimistic about renewal, and I’m sad about that.  I’m really enjoying it.

On the DVR/Unreviewed:  down to 20…